Artificial intelligence was supposed to be the great equalizer—cold, calculating machines that would cut through human bias with surgical precision. Instead, we've created digital zealots so consumed with Trump hatred they're blaming him for floods, riots, and probably next week's meteor showers. Our billion-dollar language models have become expensive liberal arts graduates with silicon souls, regurgitating every fever dream from the resistance playbook.
When users recently asked AI assistants about the devastating floods in Texas, they received responses that would make even the most partisan pundit blush. Both Grok, Elon Musk's X platform AI, and Perplexity somehow managed to blame Donald Trump for natural disasters, even though these floods occurred due to natural weather patterns, not presidential policies. The responses cited Trump's budget priorities and climate policies as direct causes of flooding, as if presidential decisions could conjure storm systems. This isn't just bad analysis—it's the digital equivalent of a political fever dream.
The symptoms of this digital derangement continue to manifest in increasingly absurd ways. When ChatGPT was recently asked about riots in Los Angeles, it immediately blamed President Trump for causing the unrest, claiming his deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to assist ICE raids was 'the biggest problem' and the root cause of the riots. The AI painted Trump's response to already-occurring civil unrest as the instigating factor, describing federal intervention as 'inflaming tensions' and turning the situation into a 'flashpoint.' In reality, the riots were already underway when Trump responded with law enforcement. Yet the AI's response reads like resistance fan fiction, transforming a federal response to violence into the cause of that violence—a classic case of reversing cause and effect to fit a political narrative.
